Top 10 Wikipedia Alternative & Similar Websites 

Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia that relies on hundreds of unpaid editors to maintain order. It is impossible to envision of a circumstance in which millions of anonymous people could reliably update a living encyclopedia with facts and impartiality. It’s no surprise that many people are looking for credible alternatives to Wikipedia. We believe you have come to the right place.

The purpose of this article is to provide a list of the top 10 Wikipedia alternatives and similar websites. All of these are encyclopedias, and some of them are simply more credible versions of Wikipedia. Whether it’s science or pop culture, some encyclopedias are masterworks on their own limited subject matter.

This post will focus on the best Wikipedia alternatives that are worth your time.

Top Wikipedia Alternative & Similar Website

Wikipedia’s material is constantly expanding as new articles are added by readers from all over the world. Wikipedia is not authoritative like most other alternative encyclopedic resources. Now, therefore, here we are with some top alternatives to Wikipedia.

Encyclopedia Britannica Online

This is your best option as an alternative to online encyclopedias like Wikipedia. This is the most reliable and objective source of information available today.

On this website, you can access the whole Encyclopedia Britannica in digital form, complete with visual materials and a simple search bar. It includes all of the most recent volumes of the Britannica (hardcopy) and comes equipped with simple-to-operate search functions. 

It’s not based on the same model as Wikipedia, but the information it contains is far more credible, so you may feel confident citing it. Since this is not a collaborative wiki, updates to the content are handled by experts.

The drawback is that you won’t be able to access certain articles in it until you sign up with a subscription fee. However, the time and effort are well worth it when you find the relevant information you can reference.

Read: Secret Method Methods to Get Wikipedia Backlinks by FREE

Everybodywiki.com

After Wikipedia, “EverybodyWiki” is one of the most up-to-date and comprehensive digital encyclopedias available at this time. EverybodyWiki is a fantastic alternative, and in contrast to Wikipedia, a growing number of companies, entrepreneurs, and artists are beginning to make use of it in order to enhance their online presence and better control their reputations.

The site contains a lot of the same tools that Wikipedia has, like the VisualEditor and a mobile-friendly interface. Users who are logged in have the ability to create whatever page they choose, in contrast to Wikipedia. 

Even if the user is a complete unknown, they have the ability to compose their own biography. In order for an article to remain on EverybodyWiki, it does not need to be very notable or well-known.

Fandom.com

When it comes to knowledge about any imaginary world, fandom is the library. Wikipedia focuses mostly on information about real-world entities such as individuals, groups, and events. Whether it’s a video game, television show, movie, manga, comic book, or pop culture phenomenon, there’s always a fanbase for it. Fandom supplies the backstory for every character in every story.

If you’re a fan of entertainment or video games, Fandom is the place to be. The world of fandom is the one in which entertainment devotees discover their true interests. Here, readers from all around the world collaborate on a character wiki based on a wide range of sources.

The advent of fandom has made it possible for enthusiasts to become well-versed in the background information around their favorite fictional characters from television, film, and video games.

Due to the fact that this was edited by a fan, you should not accept all that you read here. In order to get a true sense of the character, you should read the original works.

Wikitia.com

Wikitia is an English-language, free-content, web-based encyclopedia that uses a methodology in which only editors with verified identities can make changes to the articles. Wikipedia articles are written by editors who are experts in their respective fields. 

When comparing Wikipedia with Wikitia, the editing process is where the two sites most diverge. At Wikitia, users of all ages are welcome to make content suggestions, but they won’t be able to make any changes until an established editor has checked and approved them. 

On the other hand, administrators and editors on Wikipedia are able to make decisions even if they lack experience or information that has been independently confirmed in a certain area or subject. In many cases, political perception plays a role in this.

Due to the fact that all edits become live only after being approved by a Wikitia verified editor, the amount of false information and vandalism on the site has decreased significantly.

Wikialpha.org

If you’re looking for an alternative to Wikipedia, consider WikiAlpha. It serves as an open-access encyclopedia, diary, and news source. Articles on WikiAlpha can be about anything that is legal to write about, including news, independent research, humor, an internet phenomenon, websites, blogs, and projects, in contrast to Wikipedia’s notability criteria.

As long as your work does not violate our rapid removal policy, it will probably stay on WikiAlpha indefinitely. You can start an article on the pop group you just formed, your beloved dog, yourself, or your house, and it will likely stay there forever.

WikiAlpha does not demand anything in terms of notability, although sources are still necessary in case content is contested or erased by other editors.

Scholarpedia 

Scholarpedia is an online, English-language encyclopedia that aspires to include high-quality content in the fields of science and medicine and has many of the same qualities as open-access, online academic publications. While visually similar, there are key differences between the two sites.

The goal of the site is to provide a trustworthy alternative to popular encyclopedias like Wikipedia. Both allow users to provide feedback and edit content, but academics are the ones who develop Scholarpedia. 

Before being given responsibility for a certain area of study, experts must either be invited or elected. It’s a respectable substitute for Wikipedia, the most popular free encyclopedia, but its articles are far more reliable.

With this in place, vandalism is never an issue, and you can rest assured that any new content uploaded to the site will be correct and properly credited. All contributors to an article must have their real names and institutions listed.

Citizendium

If you’re looking for a wiki that strikes a balance between the relative freedom of Wikipedia and the heavy-handed moderation of Scholarpedia, you might want to check out Citizendium. Citizendium was founded by Larry Sanger, a founder of Wikipedia, as a sort of companion to that project.

Citizendium has a little more effective peer review procedure because it requires all contributors to use their real names when signing up for the site. Before making editorial decisions, editors are asked to present their credentials, including their academic background and a list of their published works. 

Even though it’s still in beta, the site is rapidly gaining popularity as a viable Wikipedia substitute. However, unlike Wikipedia, articles on Citizendium are supposed to have verifiable credentials and disclaimers even if they haven’t been reviewed by experts.

Encyclopedia.com

When it comes to online free encyclopedias, this one is arguably second only to Wikipedia. It obtains its data from more than one hundred distinct dictionaries, encyclopedias, and thesauruses, some of which include Oxford’s World Encyclopedia, The Columbia Encyclopedia, the Encyclopedia of World Biography, and Webster’s New World Dictionary, in addition to a great number of other reputable publications covering topics such as healthcare, science, technology, and more.

Content on Encyclopedia.com ranges from written articles to visual media such as images and videos, and is culled from a wide variety of published reference sources.

When a user visits Encyclopedia.com, they can look up information on any topic in great depth. More than that, it’s totally free to use, available in a wide range of languages, and packed with the most reliable data possible in a wide range of subject areas.

Having advertisements all over the website is great for keeping it free, but it can be quite annoying for consumers and can even cause some of the content to shift when ads suddenly appear. The constant flow of advertising is quite annoying.

World Book Online

The World Book Online encyclopedia is an online version of the well-known World Book encyclopedia, which covers thousands of topics and offers additional hyperlinks, videos, as well as other resources to help readers gain a more thorough understanding of the topic.

There is a clear emphasis on technical, scientific, and medical content, and the readability and interest level make it ideal for middle schoolers and young teens.

World Book Online, like many other free web encyclopedias, is accessible via its website online as well as features content on hundreds of different topics. The multimedia format of the online encyclopedia makes it ideal for use in the classroom.

The vast body of knowledge that is the World Book Encyclopedia is made available through online databases based on various articles from their encyclopedias. Users can listen to entries instead of reading them thanks to the “Read Aloud” function. That change has made it so the encyclopedia is simple to use.

Infoplease

Infoplease is an online resource with a wide variety of content suitable for advanced learners at the secondary and tertiary levels. It offers brief explanations on many subjects, such as physics, mathematics, entertainment, sports, etc. Infoplease can also serve as a quick reference tool, helping you learn about things like terminology, historical events, and statistics.

Infoplease provides concise and informative summaries of various topics in place of in-depth entries such as those found on Wikipedia. Although much shorter in length, the material is reliable and cannot be altered by readers, who are also prevented from adding their own notes. 

The site is a great resource for any kind of research your children may be conducting. It will be a fantastic alternative to Wikipedia because of its free entry cost and better-structured, integrated material.

Uncyclopedia: Satirical Mention

The spoof website Uncyclopedia is a bold attempt to mock the popularity of Wikipedia. Some might interpret it as an exaggerated reaction to the overly serious “Wikipedians” who browse Wikipedia. The similarities between the two websites are remarkable, starting with the logo and continuing through the entry formatting. 

In any case, make no mistake believing it.  you should not believe anything you read on Uncyclopedia as fact because it’s done to further poke fun at Wikipedia’s inaccuracies.  If you’re sick of Wikipedia’s inaccuracies and want to laugh about it, you should visit this parody site.

Which One Should You Follow?

The content of Wikipedia is constantly growing, making it the most comprehensive free online encyclopedia. Moreover, it dwarfs the size of numerous print publications, including the printed Encyclopedia Britannica.

While it is true that you may need to conduct some additional research to verify the material you find on Wikipedia, it is quite unusual to be unable to find what you are looking for.

However, if you require absolutely dependable information with no sourcing doubts, it’s advisable to stick with credible Wikipedia alternatives & Similar Websites. For instance, you could use Scholarpedia or the online version of the Encyclopedia Britannica.

You won’t find a better resource than Wikipedia if you need answers quickly and without spending a dime. We recommend choosing one of these other alternatives if you want to get into greater depth on a particular approach, subject, or even Klingon.

Bottom Line

Wikipedia is a global phenomenon, and as such, it has spawned a plethora of language-specific versions. Wikipedia has had a potentially dangerous impact at times because of problems with its open content structure. 

False information has the potential to be widely believed and fast circulated. As a result, it can be exploited in political contexts to spread disinformation. There are a great many additional options available, despite the fact that this website may serve as a useful springboard for further research. 

Here are the top 10 Wikipedia alternatives and similar websites listed above. The number of people who disagree with Wikipedia’s methods and policies is bound to increase, but so are the opportunities for other, more reliable online encyclopedias.